<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Screencasting With Jing Gets Even Easier</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michael-pick.com/screencasting-with-jing-gets-even-easier/2007/10/11/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michael-pick.com/screencasting-with-jing-gets-even-easier/2007/10/11</link>
	<description>Experiments With Lightbulb Moments</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
	
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Pick</title>
		<link>http://michael-pick.com/screencasting-with-jing-gets-even-easier/2007/10/11#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Pick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michael-pick.com/2007/10/11/screencasting-with-jing-gets-even-easier/#comment-430</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,

Can't say I have I'm afraid. I think Jing is great for quick, down and dirty grabs to send to a friend or tech support explaining something, but beyond that its limits start to shine through for me.

If you want a bit more flexibility but are still on a budget, you might want to take a look at &lt;a href="http://camstudio.org/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Camstudio&lt;/a&gt; if you use Windows (it's free and exports to AVI &#038; SWF), if you haven't already.

On a Mac &lt;a href="http://www.shinywhitebox.com/home/home.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;iShowU&lt;/a&gt; is very cheap ($20) and packs in a whole lot of tweakability.The developer behind it has just released a QT and core image effects frontend called Stomp too - great for easy resizing, compression, adding filters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t say I have I&#8217;m afraid. I think Jing is great for quick, down and dirty grabs to send to a friend or tech support explaining something, but beyond that its limits start to shine through for me.</p>
<p>If you want a bit more flexibility but are still on a budget, you might want to take a look at <a href="http://camstudio.org/" rel="nofollow">Camstudio</a> if you use Windows (it&#8217;s free and exports to AVI &#038; SWF), if you haven&#8217;t already.</p>
<p>On a Mac <a href="http://www.shinywhitebox.com/home/home.html" rel="nofollow">iShowU</a> is very cheap ($20) and packs in a whole lot of tweakability.The developer behind it has just released a QT and core image effects frontend called Stomp too - great for easy resizing, compression, adding filters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Sciora</title>
		<link>http://michael-pick.com/screencasting-with-jing-gets-even-easier/2007/10/11#comment-424</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Sciora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michael-pick.com/2007/10/11/screencasting-with-jing-gets-even-easier/#comment-424</guid>
		<description>It seems like Jing screen casts don't honor the scaling parameters during playback. The video always plays at the recorded resolution which means  capturing at the lowest resolution.

Have you found a solution for this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like Jing screen casts don&#8217;t honor the scaling parameters during playback. The video always plays at the recorded resolution which means  capturing at the lowest resolution.</p>
<p>Have you found a solution for this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
