Boing Boing TV - Robotic In The Least Cool Way Possible

I was probably as excited as anybody at the thought of Boing Boing TV launching, as a huge fan of the blog. But in spite of the mild and in some places sycophantic praise being bandied around, I have to say that the first episode royally sucked.

boing-boing-tv.jpg

Why?

For me, Rocketboom has long been the Boing Boing of Internet TV/Web Video/call it what you will. And Rocketboom has perfected the format, fine tuning it to a veritable art form. In comparison, Boing Boing TV feels like a weak latecomer to the game. It’s a shame the partnership between the two never came off.

Everything about the first episode felt utterly wrong. From the utterly wooden, soulless, pseudo-spunky delivery of Mark Frauenfelder and Xeni Jardin, down to the nauseating red swirling cloud background straight out of After Effects 101.

What works so well on the “pages” of Boing Boing felt for me like something being read off the pages in the video version. Boing Boing the blog manages to walk that trashy, irony-fueled perhaps somewhat nineties path with gusto, and pulls it off. On video it simply comes across as smug, heartless, cynically knocked together, predictable, and… Ok, I just didn’t enjoy it.

We’ve seen this before. Watch, for example, Loren Feldman’s hilarious response to Om Malik’s web TV venture. What makes for a great blogger doesn’t always add up to a great presenter.

But as Boing Boing is totally personality driven, it never should have been like this.

Still, if you’ve ever seen a film directed by Stephen King, or witnessed Iggy Pop trying to act it becomes apparent that what utterly rocks in one medium doesn’t translate so well to another. At least not with the same person or people behind it.

I haven’t written the show off yet - Cory Doctorow could well save the day, and once Xeni and Mark take the ventriloquist’s hand out of their asses, relax and get comfortable with being talking heads it might just work.

I wanted to like this, I really did. But it’s a competitive game this web trivia business, and if Boing Boing TV wants to compete with the hordes of video savvy websters they need to up their game. With that said, as they are Technorati’s number two blog they will doubtless get a huge following anyway, and I will be branded a heretic by the three people that read my blog. So there you go.

Go on, treat yourself:

Oh, and if you’d like to see some creative use of retro stock footage, rather than this sub-Mystery Science Theater 3000 drivel, check out the excellent mashup artistry that is Next To Heaven.It could have been so beautiful. *Sigh*

Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

4 Comments

  1. Posted October 3, 2007 at 9:31 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for the kind words for Next To Heaven. Maybe Boing Boing will pick me up as a weekly feature . . . one can dream! Another one of my videos did make Boing Boing -
    http://www.boingboing.net/2006/03/28/excellent-video-of-e.html
    But, NTH never broke through.

    Cheers
    Rob

  2. Michael
    Posted October 4, 2007 at 2:34 am | Permalink

    Hi Rob,

    Thanks for stopping by. Next To Heaven is the most beautiful thing out there in web video land, and one of the few things that makes me laugh, when it isn’t giving me a chill down my spine.

    I’d love to speak more about it with you in the future if you ever have the time. Mashup genius.

    Now if only Boing Boing had hired you instead of putting out this third rate crap the world would have been a brighter place.

    Cheers

    Michael

  3. Posted October 16, 2007 at 5:22 pm | Permalink

    I concur on Next to Heaven. Rob did a great job.
    Michael, the people at Boing Boing TV could learn a couple of tips from http://www.izzyvideo.com (currently 66 videos on proper video shooting, etc).

    Have you ever heard of this site? Check out the podcast articles on the right. You probably learned most of this in your schooling, but for the average Joe, it’s invaluable.

    Regards
    Shane

  4. Posted October 16, 2007 at 5:27 pm | Permalink

    Hey Shane, thanks for stopping by!

    Yeah, Israel Hyman does a great job of making FCP accessible, for sure. Picked up a couple of good hints from him before. He has just started monetizing the site I think, which seems very fair to me considering the amount of work that goes into it. Hopefully that will be a success for him.

    Cheers,

    Michael

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*
  • Find Me Elsewhere

    
  • Lifestream

    
  • Archives

  • Categories

  • Blogroll

  • You